Skip to content

Consequences of Poor Data Destruction Explained

Written By:

Chris Regan

Founder

CLR Solutions LLC

Businesses replace technology fast. Laptops get upgraded, servers get refreshed, phones get swapped, and “that box of old hard drives” quietly grows in a closet somewhere.

The risk is that disposal becomes an afterthought—handled like normal recycling, a quick reset, or a handoff to a third party with vague assurances. And when that happens, the consequences aren’t theoretical. Poor data destruction can turn yesterday’s equipment into tomorrow’s breach, audit issue, or legal headache. And because “data destruction” can mean a few different things in practice—wiping, shredding, degaussing, and more—it helps to be clear on what method was actually used and what proof you’ll have afterward.

Below are the real-world outcomes companies and individuals face when data-bearing devices aren’t handled correctly—and why documentation matters almost as much as the destruction itself.

1) Data exposure that turns into a full breach (with real costs)

When sensitive data leaks, the impact is rarely limited to “someone might see it.” It can trigger incident response, legal review, customer notifications, credit monitoring, downtime, and reputational damage—all of which add up quickly.

IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024 puts the U.S. average breach cost at $9.36 million.

Poor end-of-life handling doesn’t cause every breach, but it creates a painfully avoidable one: devices that leave your control with recoverable data still on them. That’s why organizations that take cybersecurity seriously treat IT asset disposition as part of security—not a cleanup task.

What makes device-related incidents especially frustrating is that they often start with normal operations: a refresh cycle, an office move, a storage cleanout, or a contractor pickup. If your process doesn’t include inventory, verification, and proof, you may not even know what data was exposed until someone else discovers it.

When organizations can’t show that devices were properly wiped or destroyed, regulators often focus on two things:

  • Was sensitive data protected?
  • Did the organization oversee vendors and maintain controls?

A widely cited U.S. example is the SEC’s 2022 action against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. The SEC said the firm failed over a multi-year period to properly dispose of devices containing customer personal information, including using a moving/storage vendor without data-destruction expertise and failing to monitor the work. The SEC announcement notes the devices were resold, including via online auctions, with some customer data still present—resulting in a $35 million penalty.

Healthcare has its own high-stakes version of this. In 2022, HHS OCR announced a settlement tied to the improper disposal of protected health information (PHI), including a $300,640 payment and corrective action requirements.

The lesson isn’t “every mistake becomes a headline.” It’s that disposal is treated as part of safeguarding. If the process is sloppy, under-documented, or outsourced without oversight, enforcement risk goes up—especially when sensitive data is involved.

3) Identity theft and personal harm when “old devices” aren’t actually empty

For individuals, the fallout is often personal: unauthorized credit activity, account takeovers, tax fraud, and months of cleanup.

The FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network reported 1.1 million identity theft reports in 2024 (based on consumer reports collected in its database).

That number includes many kinds of identity theft—so it wouldn’t be honest to say “this is all from old laptops.” But it does underline why personal data is valuable and aggressively misused. If a drive, phone, or even a copier/printer hard drive leaves your control with recoverable data, you’ve created one more path for that misuse.

For consumers and small offices, the risk often hides in plain sight: old devices might still contain saved passwords, synced email, scanned tax forms, medical portal logins, or HR documents. “It’s old” doesn’t mean “it’s safe.”

4) “We can’t prove it” becomes the problem in audits, contracts, and insurance

Sometimes the most damaging part isn’t what happened—it’s what you can’t demonstrate.

If you ever need to answer questions like:
“What happened to these 47 laptops from last year’s refresh?”
“Were the drives destroyed or wiped?”
“Which serial numbers were included?”
“Who handled them, and when?”

…then the ability to produce clear documentation becomes a business function, not paperwork.

This is exactly why certificates of destruction (and chain-of-custody records) matter. And for organizations that want stronger proof, serialized audit reporting (model, serial number, asset tags, and where the media came from) can be the difference between “we believe it was handled” and “here’s the evidence.”

This is also where vendor management matters. If disposal is handled by a general contractor, moving company, or reseller without a defined sanitization workflow, you can end up owning the risk without having the records to defend your decisions later.

5) Reputational damage and lost trust (the quiet consequence)

Even when fines don’t apply, reputational damage does.

A single story—“customer data found on discarded hardware” or “patient information disposed improperly”—can erode trust that took years to build. For many organizations, the bigger cost isn’t the immediate response; it’s the long tail: harder sales conversations, procurement hurdles, and more scrutiny from partners. In regulated industries, it can also mean tighter contract requirements and more frequent audits.

6) Environmental consequences when destruction and recycling aren’t planned together

There’s also a sustainability angle people forget: poor data destruction often leads to poor recycling.

When organizations treat devices as “trash,” they’re more likely to stockpile equipment indefinitely, dispose of it inconsistently, or send it into untracked channels. Stockpiling creates its own risks (loss, theft, forgotten assets), and untracked channels can undermine both security and environmental goals.

A cleaner approach is to combine secure data handling with responsible downstream recycling and reuse—so devices with resale value can be wiped and recovered, and devices that must be destroyed can still be recycled properly afterward.

What “being careful” actually looks like (without getting overly technical)

For most businesses, avoiding these consequences comes down to a few practical habits:

  • Treat IT disposal as part of security, not facilities cleanup.
  • Know what you have (basic asset inventory for data-bearing devices).
  • Use a documented process (wiping and verification when reusing; physical destruction when required).
  • Require proof (certificate of destruction + serialized reporting when appropriate).
  • Keep chain-of-custody records so you can show who handled devices and when.

For organizations in the Tri-State area,CLR Solutions supports that full picture—ITAD, secure data destruction, documentation (including certificates and serialized audits), and responsible recycling—so clients aren’t juggling multiple vendors just to do something that should be straightforward.

Bottom line

Poor data destruction has consequences that show up in the real world: expensive breaches, regulatory settlements, identity theft risks, audit friction, and reputational damage. The good news is it’s one of the more preventable cybersecurity problems—when you plan for it early, choose a responsible partner, and insist on documentation that actually proves what happened.

References
Back to Guest Blog
Scroll To Top